Podcast: Play in new window
Wednesday November 7th
hr 1 Michael Shaw founder of Freedom Advocates joins me to discuss human settlements, the attack on your car and various other fun things the communitarians are implementing all over this planet. They are evil. Pure evil. www.freedomadvocates.org
hr 2 Jerry Kirk joins me to chat. He is a freedom fighter and has a website where he has placed the information he has collected thus far called www.freedom-school.com He isn’t looking for a dime, he’s just trying to get the information that he has learned out to anyone who wants it.
The following is an article by Jim Kirwan
http://rense.com/general92/agenda21.htm
‘In order to save the world we must first of all destroy the world, in order to remake our world in a sustainable way.’
AGENDA 21
A partial transcript of the 9 minute video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM&feature=player_embedded
“Agenda 21 is the 1992 United Nations real declaration on the environment and development. It is the agenda for the twenty-first century for a ‘Brave New World’ where everything that you’ve cherished and held true will no longer exist.
Agenda 21 defines itself as ‘the comprehensive plan of action’ to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations systems. It also elevates nature above man and it contains something called the Precautionary Principle where basically you’re guilty until proven innocent. Sustainable Development is the philosophy designed to bring human beings across the globe under the full control of a narrow human-elite. It’s a forty chapter document to basically control the world. It’s based entirely on social control mechanisms.” (This was what George H. W. Bush had in mind when he introduced the need for a New World Order on September 11, 1990) (1)
“Sustainable Developers have designed a global movement coordinated through a global action plan to create world government in accordance with certain objectives. These objectives include an end to national sovereignty, the abolition of private property, the restructure of the family unit, and increasing limitations and restrictions on mobility and individual opportunity.
The ‘Green Goal’ includes the listings of ‘what is not sustainable.’ A couple examples include: Private property! Seven twenty-eight lists fossil fuels. Golf courses and ski-lodges are not (sustainable). Irrigation is not-sustainable. Paved roads; Consumerism agriculture, herbicides, pesticides; elsewhere it lists farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock and the family unit. The focus of sustainable development is the abolition of private property; societal undermining of the family and abandonment of the constitutional protection of unalienable rights as established in the Declaration of Independence.
In the 1990’s . . . mother-earth’s surface wasn’t to be scratched. Human beings were to be concentrated into human settlement zones. Educational systems were to focus on the environment as the central organizing principle all aspects of life were covered.
I went to these committees at the request of some people who told me that I needed to understand what was going on and I came back and I said ‘ This is craziness, this is so silly it has no chance of having any effect on our society.’ Well I was wrong.
The United States’ government support for the sustainable development Agenda 21 is very clear: In 1992 while the real conference was going on, George Bush then president, was there where he executed the Agenda and the 21 protocols on behalf of the United States, and brought it back to Washington D.C. Within a year Bill Clinton, BY EXECUTIVE ORDER, no congressional review, established The President’s Counsel for ‘Sustainable Development.’
In Santa Cruz we’ve got a two lane freeway system, we need four but what we’re getting is hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money to dig a dilapidated rail line that Southern Pacific wants to put in the hands of somebody else; so that a commuter line can be built along the railroad-track that will be followed by fourteen story buildings where people will live in ‘stack-em and pack-em units where developers sop called ‘sustainable developers’ will be these highrises with federal dollars. In fact Santa Cruz has received a 300 million dollar federal grant to build the first three thousand of these stack & pack units. The county Board of Supervisors said that ‘If you’re a sustainable developer then you’re immune from any construction ‘defect liability.’ It’s a partnership (private) between selected developers building this New World Order and using tax-payer dollars in order to do it.
