There will be no work for Whites! says ANC Mayor …

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

There will be no work for Whites!

Starvin’ and killin’ Whitey in South Africa is the name of the game. Gee, what’s that you say? You don’t believe it because you didn’t see it on the MSM? The information will never appear on the MSM because the truth doesn’t fit their agenda. And that agenda is the dissolution of the White race by any and all means at their disposal. No job, no food, no food, no life.

   Well, have I got a treat for you. Here it is for all the world to see.  Read it!  You’re in bondage to the lies you’ve been told all your lives. Break free. See and speak the truth and you will be set free.

Did you know that White people are now barred from having  jobs in Johannesburg, SA? Their Black Economic Empowerment laws bar Whites from jobs. Read this:

African National Congress (ANC) Mayor of Johannesburg Parks Tau: ‘There will be no work for whites’!

whites denied all jobs by ANC mayor Parks Tau Johannesburg June1420122 DIEVOORBLAD FREEDOMFRONTPLUS

The future is happening right now, right before your very eyes. Is there any correlation between what is happening in South Africa and what is happening here in America?   I forgot, most of you have been brainwashed to “see” only what they want you to “see”. The truth never enters your mind and if someone dares point out the truth to you, they must be a racist for “seeing” it  and trying to get you to “see” it too.  Unless people are willing to “see” what is right in front of them, and “hear” what they are being told, we are doomed.

So what do you think will happen here, in the very near future, in this communist controlled nation? What was it one of those highly paid shills said not too long ago? Oh, I remember now. She said, “demographics is destiny”.  Same commies who control it all here, control it all down there too. Don’t be fooled by their puppet front men; NEVER forget, they work to advance their Masters agenda. They only lead the death march, they didn’t write the tune.

So what group do you belong to; the group that “sees” the truth and speaks it or the group that pretends there is nothing to “see”?


I saw Satan fall like a lightning-flash out of Heaven. Lucifer. (1) #1ab


Stop the Con Con train…

Print pagePDF pageEmail page



Amendments Convention; Convention of the States; and/or Article V Convention


A Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) is just that, regardless the various softened names it has recently been given. The call for a Con-Con is on the march throughout this country; it is armed and it is dangerous.

Its arms: Fabrications, confusing language, legal ‘terms of art’, and outright lies by advocates manipulating the current fast-paced movement by legislators.

Its danger: In today’s economic climate states are broke; legislators are frantic, panicking and grasping at straws. They’ve been lulled and seduced into believing every deceitful lie they’ve been told, and are now rushing to get resolutions passed so they can “fix” the problem.

Their solution? An “Article V Amendment Convention (Con-Con) to add a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. . . or is it their solution?  

Legislators know and admit that most officials in all branches of government pay no attention to the Constitution. In fact, today we could say the U.S. Government and Congress have trampled the Constitution, ignoring the Bill of Rights at every turn.

How, then, can any state legislator convince him/her self that a balanced budget amendment would be treated any differently?

We discover that “the fix” is being promulgated – again – by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a non-partisan membership organization boasting a membership of over 2,000 conservative state legislators. To set the fix, a 43 page handbook, titled: Proposing Constitutional Amendments by a Convention of the States, was provided to their mostly-republican members, along with model legislation to carry back to their states. 

Reading the Handbook is like watching mainstream news: disinformation, spin and lies at every turn. However it gives us an understanding as to how the legislators are being harangued, goaded and shamed into taking this action. From the Handbook: (emphasis on this and following quotes are ours)

“…despite recurrent hopeful talk about how Congress might adopt a BBA [balanced budget amendment] or other corrective amendments on its own, history suggests reformers cannot depend on that. The states must do the job, as our Founders expected them to do.” p 7

“… thus far the states have never exercised their corresponding power to correct federal abuses. As a result, the constitutional design has become unbalanced.” p 7

Move fast. America is in serious trouble; don’t be sidetracked by alarmism or by hope that Congress may propose an amendment limiting its own power. History shows this is unlikely. p 21

State legislators believe that they will have complete control over the process, electing delegates and managing the Convention. Here’s why they believe it:

“Ron Natelson [author of the Handbook] encourages legislators to promote the right amendments, use the right amount of specificity, and keep the process within the states’ control.” p iv

“The convention is a deliberative body whose members answer to the state legislatures they represent.” p 9

Retain state control over the convention. (their emphasis) State legislators applying for a convention must send a clear message to Congress that this procedure is within the control of the states. Congress’ obligations are to count the applications, call the convention on the states’ behalf, and choose a mode of ratification. Those are the prerogatives of the state legislatures and of the convention delegates responsible to the state legislatures.” p 21


read more



Let’s undermine traditional values, shall we?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page


The roots of the United Nations — the most visible part of the new global management system — might be compared to the many deep and spreading roots of a tenacious vine. Some of the roots are short and shallow. Others are long and deep, firmly imbedded in powerful social, political and financial institutions in Europe and North America, which — for various reasons — shared Lord Tennyson’s vision of a “federation of the world.”

The tangled roots of this vine spread beneath the surface of public life until 1945, when delegates from 50 countries met in San Francisco to sign the UN Charter. Communist spy, Alger Hiss, co-authored that founding charter and served as the first acting UN Secretary-General. This initial glimpse of the global agenda should have raised a big red flag. But our war-torn world was already blinded by the well-publicized vision of a peaceable planet “lapt in universal law.” Who dared oppose such a noble purpose?

Actually, many Americans did see the sign posts along the way, but their warnings were drowned out by the mainstream media’s resounding praise. Small wonder! The 25 main U.S. newspapers had been bought by the banking goliath, J. P. Morgan — one of the stronger stems in the vine’s tangled root system.

The young vine grew fast and its branches spread throughout the world. The signs of political and social compromise multiplied. It was no secret that each consecutive socialist Secretary General — Trygve Lie (from Norway but recommended by Russia), Dag Hammersjold (Sweden), U Thant (Burma), Kurt Waldheim (Austria), etc. — sympathized with Communism and helped build an imposing web of international declarations and treaties (“soft” laws) that would overrule constitutional rights and domestic laws in America.

For decades only Communist leaders would fill the UN’s highest military post, Under-Secretary-General for Political and Security Council Affairs. Fourteen of the fifteen men who held this vital post up until 1995 (and probably into the new century[2]) represented the USSR. The one exception was Dragoslav Protitich, a Communist from Yugoslavia. So when American soldiers fought Communism in Korea and Vietnam in partnership with the UN, the top UN military leaders were Communists. No wonder American soldier fought two futile and deadly wars.

How could the public be so deceived? Part of the answer lies in subtle power of gradualism — the incremental steps that function like the proverbial frog in the pot of slow-heating water. You become so used to gradual change that you hardly notice the next step.

Just as important is the grand vision of global peace, which burns in the heart of many idealists who have learned to hate war. These two — vision and gradualism — serve to both motivate and deceive the masses at the same time. Of course, many of the leaders who utilize these strategies have more totalitarian goals in mind.

That quest began long for Alfred Lord Tennyson penned his visionary poem, Locksley Hall. History points to monumental feats such as the Tower of Babel, the vast Hittite, Babylonian and Persian civilizations and, later, the Greek, Roman, Byzantine and Muslim empires. In more modern times the world watched with awe as “civilized” nations such as Russia and Germany sacrificed personal freedom and millions of lives on their altars to Soviet and Nazi dreams of totalitarian socialism.

Hindsight helps us trace the early, incremental steps toward a world government, and we can now look back at a foundation laid by an eclectic blend of socialist visionaries, global-minded financiers, communist revolutionaries, secret societies, New Age leaders, wealthy capitalist and tax-exempt foundations primarily in Great Britain and the USA. Long before the United Nations became an official organ under socialist leadership, that early vision had spread through all the main institutionsThe Aquarian Conspiracy, summarized its nature well:. As Marilyn Ferguson wrote in The Aquarian Conspiracy,

“Broader than reform, deeper than revolution, this benign conspiracy for a new human agenda has triggered the most rapid cultural realignment in history…. There are legions of conspirators. They are in corporations, universities and hospitals, on the faculties of public schools, in factories and doctors’ offices, in state and federal agencies, on city councils and the White House staff, in state legislatures, in volunteer organizations, in virtually all arenas of policy-making in the country…. They have coalesced into small groups in every town and institution.”The Aquarian Conspiracy, summarized its nature well: [3] pages 23-24

To fulfill this dream of a New World Order that would serve the grandiose economic and social interests of its early visionaries, two steps were essential:

  1. Establish an efficient global management system that would join the nations of the world through processes that would appear “democratic” and would produce compliance with specific sets of goals and standards.

  2. Use this management system to mold minds, undermine sovereignty, establish social solidarity and train a mobile global workforce through —

    • The redistribution of human and financial resources (through migration, a global economy and a global welfare system).

  • A uniform worldwide education system that would standardize both social “learning” and work skills everywhere.

  • Control of the mainstream media and other propaganda channels. Professor Carrol Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope,

“There grew up in the 20th century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. The American branch of this ‘English Establishment’ exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (New York Times and Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post…) [4.Quigley, 953]

  • A supportive “civil society” (including business, community groups, the news and entertainment media, churches, etc) prepared to lead the masses toward cultural and religious synthesis in communities and organizations around the world using the dialectic process — a strategy well tested and proven in the former Soviet Union. (Many participants — including churches — may never know how their new business practices and small group dialogues help undermine traditional values and prepare their members for the new global society.)

  • read more here


Solzhenitsyn’s Warning to the “Free” World

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Solzhenitsyn’s Warning to the “Free” World

“Few have explained this Communist-Capitalist partnership better — or exposed Soviet terrors more effectively — than Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. After criticizing Stalin in a letter to a friend, he was imprisoned for spreading “anti-Soviet propaganda” and served eight years in torturous Soviet labor camps (1945-1953). When he seemed to be dying of stomach cancer, a faithful doctor shared his testimony and apparently led Solzhenitsyn to put His faith in God. Exiled to Kazakhstan, he was restored to health. In his 1976 book, Warning to the West, he tells us that–

“…there also exists another alliance – at first glance a strange one, a surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which is well-grounded and easy to understand…. [This] is the alliance between our Communist leaders and your capitalists.”

“This alliance is not new. The very famous Armand Hammer, who is flourishing here today, laid the basis for this when he made the first exploratory trip into Russia, still in Lenin’s time, in the very first years of the Revolution. He was extremely successful in this intelligence mission and since that time for all these 50 years, we observe continuous and steady support by the businessmen of the West of the Soviet Communist leaders.

“[Russia’s] clumsy and awkward economy, which could never overcome its own difficulties by itself, is continually getting material and technological assistance. The major construction projects in the initial five-year plan were built exclusively with American technology and materials. And if today the Soviet Union has powerful military and police forces – in a country which is by contemporary standards poor — they are used to crush our movement for freedom in the Soviet Union….

“Certain of your businessmen, on their own initiative, established an exhibition of criminological technology in Moscow. This was the most recent and elaborate technology, which here, in your country, is used to catch criminals, to bug them, to spy on them, to photograph them, to tail them, to identify criminals. This was taken to Moscow to an exhibition in order that the Soviet KGB agents could study it, as if not understanding what sort of criminals [political resisters]… would be hunted by the KGB….

“Lenin foretold this whole process. Lenin, who spent most of his life in the West and not in Russia, who knew the West much better than Russia, always wrote and said that the western capitalists would do anything to strengthen the economy of the USSR….

“Through the decades of the 1920s, the 1930s, the 1940s, the 1950s, the whole Soviet press wrote: Western capitalism, your end is near. But it was as if the capitalists had not heard, could not understand, could not believe this.

“Nikita Khrushchev came here and said, ‘We will bury you!’ They didn’t believe that, either. They took it as a joke. Now, of course, they have become more clever in our country. Now they don’t say ‘we are going to bury you’ anymore, now they say ‘detente.'” Nothing has changed[16] in Communist ideology.”

But everything has been changing in America!

Why? What can we do?

A key part of this planned transformation is Islamic terrorism, which has been fueled, funded and used by Russia. As in George Orwell’s 1984, there are three main forces used to destabilize the world and create the dissatisfaction needed for planned control in a “single world culture.”  [More on this topic]

Solzhenitsyn shows us the basic problem: rejection of Biblical Truth and values. “It is almost a joke now in the western world,” he reminds us, “to use words like ‘good’ and ‘evil.’ They have become almost old-fashioned concepts, but they are very real…. These are concepts from a sphere which is higher than us.”[17]

Indeed they are! “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,” warned Old Testament prophet Isaiah (5:20). ‘Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good,” wrote the apostle Paul. (Romans 12:9) Yet Biblical views of good and evil are fast disappearing from the American consciousness. They seem too intolerant and divisive in today’s permissive, postmodern culture…”   read more here



Few people today understand what communism really is…

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Few people today understand what communism really is and just where the political battle lines are actually drawn.  But if you crack open a dictionary and look up the term “Dialectical Materialism.”  You should find something like this:

“A philosophy founded by Karl Marx… which forms the basis of Communist doctrine:  it combines the materialistic idea of matter over mind with the Hegelian dialectic in which opposing forces are constantly being reunited at a higher level.”  — Lexicon Webster Dictionary

But that definition might beg the question, “What is the Hegelian dialectic?”  For modern man, the answer to that question is epic.  The Hegelian dialectic has profoundly impacted the world in which you live.

What is communism?

The Dialectic: Fomenting the Revolution

The concept of the dialectic has been around for a long time.  It is simply that of opposite positions:  Thesis (position) vs. Antithesis (opposite position).  In traditional logic, if my thesis was true, then all other positions were by definition untrue.  For example, if my thesis is 2 + 2 = 4, then all other answers (antithesis) are false.  Georg W.F. Hegel, the nineteenth century German philosopher, turned that concept upside down by equalizing Thesis and Antithesis.  All things are now relative.  There is no such thing as absolute truth to be found anywhere.  Instead, “truth” is found in Synthesis, a compromise of Thesis and Antithesis.  This is the heart and soul of the consensus process.

This is diametrically opposed to the Judeo-Christian world-view prevalent in the Western world for the better part of two millennia that held that God existed, that He existed outside of the material creation and that man had a moral obligation to Him and His laws.  God was transcendent and thus truth was absolute and transcendent, outside of our ability to manipulate it.

This all changed with Hegel and modern man was born.  Man could now challenge any authority and position, even God.  Since there is no such thing as absolute truth, “my truth” is just as good as “your truth”, so don’t tell me what to think or how to behave.  As Nietzsche, the “God is Dead” philosopher, would later say, “There is absolutely no absolute.”  Now 2 + 2 can equal 5, or 17, or whatever you feel is right… read more here



If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

The Department of Homeland Security is seeking to acquire 7,000 5.56x45mm NATO “personal defense weapons” (PDW) — also known as “assault weapons” when owned by civilians. The solicitation, originally posted on June 7, 2012, comes to light as the Obama administration is calling for a ban on semi-automatic rifles and high capacity magazines.

Citing a General Service Administration (GSA) request for proposal (RFP), Steve McGough of reports that DHS is asking for the 7,000 “select-fire” firearms because they are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.” The term select-fire means the weapon can be both semi-automatic and automatic. Civilians are prohibited from obtaining these kinds of weapons.

The RFP describes the firearm as “Personal Defense Weapon (PDW) – 5.56x45mm NATO, select-fire firearm suitable for personal defense use in close quarters and/or when maximum concealment is required.” Additionally, DHS is asking for 30 round magazines that “have a capacity to hold thirty (30) 5.56x45mm NATO rounds.”

Critics of such a ban on semi-automatic rifles are already arguing that the government is showing its hypocrisy by essentially saying they are good “personal defense” for them, but not for American citizens. When civilians own semi-automatic rifles, they somehow become “assault weapons.”

That being said, it is reasonable for the Department of Homeland Security to request these rifles as they are indeed effective personal defense weapons. The agency is tasked with keeping Americans safe from those who wish to do the country harm, and its officials should be equipped with all the tools they need to do so effectively.

But what about Americans who want to keep themselves and their families safe from threats? Is a semi-automatic rifle unacceptable for a civilian’s “personal defense” in his or her home? According to some Democratic lawmakers, like Sen. Feinstein, it appears the answer is yes.

Just last week two students in Rochester, N.Y. scared off a pair of home intruders by simply brandishing an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle. One of the students said he believes the weapon saved their lives.

 continue reading here


All aboard the United Nations Cooperation Circles train to…your enslavement.

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Cooperation circles sound just yummy, don’t they? After all, who doesn’t want to cooperate? But who is it you’ll be cooperating with and what is it about? There are all kinds of “cooperation circles” that one can “cooperate in”. Your next stop on the “cooperation circle” train to world enslavement is:

Key word
Agenda 21
Agenda For Development
Agenda For Peace
Armed Conflict
Brundtland Report
Business & Industry
Capacity Building
Climate Change
Coastal Areas
Consultative Relationship
Cultural Conventions
Cultural Diversity
Cultural Heritage
Decision Making
Dependent Territories
Developing Countries
Earth Stewardship
Economic And Social Council
Economic Development
Education For All
Electronic Communications
Electronic Networking
Eradication Of Poverty
Financial Arrangements
Financing For Development
Geneva Conventions
Global Commons
Global Conferences
Hazardous Wastes
Human Rights
Human Settlements
Indigenous People
Information Access
Information Ecology
Information Technology
Institutional Arrangements
Interactive Publishing
International Cooperation
International Day
International Decades
International Economic Order
International Law
International Terrorism
International Year
Interreligious Dialogue
Knowledge-based Economy
Least Developed Countries
Local Authorities
Major Groups
Marine Life
Millennium Development Goals
Ngo Participation
NGO Process
Non Governmental Organizations
Oceans & Seas
Operational Activities
Persons With Disabilities
Political Declarations
Programme Of Action
Public Participation
Radioactive Wastes
Religion & Ecology
Rights Of The Child
Rural Development
Science & Technology
Science And Technology
Science For Sustainability
Self Determination
Small Islands
Social Development
Social Justice
Solid Wastes & Sewage
Sustainable Agriculture
Sustainable Production
System Coordination
Toxic Chemicals Marxism-Socialism-Communism-Promises-Destruction

What is Community Oriented Policing? Whose spying on you?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

Read this.

Here’s an excerpt…read the entire article. …

“If ‘Equality of Opportunity’ is to become a part of the American Dream, the traditional family must be weakened.”

“In order to effect rapid change, one must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved.”  -Socio-psychologist Warren Bennis in his book, The Temporary Society. …

There is a myth that communism is dead and that the cold war is over. Nothing could be further from the truth. The problem is that few people today understand what communism really is and just where the cold war battle lines are actually drawn. Crack open a dictionary and look up the term “Dialectical Materialism.” You should find something like this:

“A philosophy founded by Karl Marx… which forms the basis of Communist doctrine: it combines the materialistic idea of matter over mind with the Hegalian dialectic in which opposing forces are constantly being reunited at a higher level.” –Webster Dictionary

But that definition might beg the question, “What is the Hegelian dialectic?” For modern man, the answer to that question is epic. The Hegelian dialectic has profoundly impacted the world in which you live.


Do you know the history of money?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

This documentary was done around 1995. You don’t know what you don’t know so it’s time to start finding out. Take the time to watch this documentary. It is long, but worth every second.  In times of an economic crisis, wealth is not destroyed, just transferred. That’s right. Your wealth is transferred to the pockets of the criminal money changers mentioned in this documentary who control it all. Here’s a timeline starting from 48 BC of their deceit.  Go here.

Please note,  the Muslims didn’t enter into history until about 700 AD.

The Rothschild dynasty leads the pack of money changers . They and a handful of others control it all.

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws.”– Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

Here are a few quotes from people who tried to warn us many years ago.

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it’s issuance.”

James Madison

“We have, in this country, one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.” — Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932 (Rep. Pa)

“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.” — James A. Garfield, President of the United States

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President.

“Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States.” — Sen. Barry Goldwater (Rep. AZ)


Now this documentary Money As Debt is a more recent documentary, but I highly suggest watching both.  Part 1 Part 2


Here today, gone tomorrow…population control

Print pagePDF pageEmail page


Population control isn’t just for the third world. You’re next.

The strategies employed to eliminate you and your offspring are not unlike the Chinese torture Death By  A Thousand Cuts.  Slowly. Gradually. Methodically manipulating your world and everything in it.  Think GMO foods, sterilants in the vaccines ( think Bill gates and the TED meeting look here), destruction of world economies in order to impoverish the populace and create mass starvation. Think Federal Reserve Banksters, Towns denying people the right to grow their own food, forcing people off their land,   Preventing you from eating foods you want like “raw milk”… starting to see the bigger picture yet?


Print pagePDF pageEmail page

We are all approaching exit zero and only some of us know it, most of us don’t.



In March 1980, when the industrial firm Wisconsin Steel abruptly closed its main mill in southeast Chicago, longtime employee Charles Walley was among 3,400 people who lost their jobs. The plant closure — which led to protests, controversy and lawsuits — had an enormous impact on Walley, a third-generation steelworker. He found intermittent employment as a tollbooth attendant, a janitor and a security guard, among other things, but never landed a better job, and remained bitter and depressed about his situation until his death in 2005.

“Yeah, we thought we were middle class there for a while,” one of his daughters once overheard him musing aloud. “We were almost middle class.” The daughter who heard that comment, Christine Walley, is now an associate professor of anthropology at MIT and author of a new book, “Exit Zero,” about the impact of deindustrialization on the lives of blue-collar workers in Chicago. In the book, published this month by the University of Chicago Press, Walley explores the lasting economic and psychological toll of such plant closings on her father and other working-class people like him.

In the book, Walley also builds an argument that rapid deindustrialization in the United States was not simply the result of seemingly inevitable shifts in the global economy, but a consequence of corporate-friendly policies, and a new emphasis on raising short-term share prices, that pitted the interests of management against the long-term interests of companies and their workers.

“If you really want to understand why there is this expanding class inequality in the United States, one of the places you have to look is the long-term impact of deindustrialization,” Walley says. “We have to think historically about how we got into this position and how we can come out of it.”

What will you do without freedom?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

What would you do without freedom_ Will you try_



Please click on the link above. Please listen to and watch a short 2 min clip.


Who controls your mind?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

In the book 1984, George Orwell warned that people were in danger of losing their freedom of mind without being aware of it while it was happening because of psychological, emotional and intellectual manipulation: Mind Control.

The principles of mind control, hypnotic suggestion and mental programming are ancient. Modern technology allows the implementation of these age-old principles on a massive scale to influence the thinking and behavior of large numbers of people. The ultimate control is to control people without their conscious awareness.

Most people do not pay conscious attention to the things that affect them subconsciously. They do not usually know what to look for. However, when pointed to, these things can be recognized and understood.

WARNING: Psychological warfare and economic warfare are being waged against America. Mind control is the most important issue facing America. . . and the world! The most effective way to protect yourself and your loved ones from subconscious manipulation is by being aware of how it works.

Listen to this NOW!  This is from a show by William Cooper in 1994. Excellent expose of mind control…




Who were the Bolsheviks aka “Reds” and what do they have to do with gun control?

Print pagePDF pageEmail page

new world order 2
Who were the Bolsheviks?  It is CRITICAL that you know who they were. Read what Captain Schuyler wrote to Colonel Barrows in 1919 below. He was there and he tells you.


Why do so few people know anything about who they were? 

They control all media and education. JP Morgan purchased the top 25 newspapers  in 1917 so they had control of everything printed.

Make sure you watch the video in the article above.

How many did they kill?

66 million.  Alexander Solzhenitsyn talks about it in his final book “Our 200 Years Together” which was never published in English, but thankfully a few of the chapters have been translated. Read them below.

Who is leading the call for gun control today?

Look here

Does it matter?

You decide.

So what did the Bolsheviks do before they started murdering millions?

Gun control.

Does history repeat itself?


Are the Bolsheviks here now?

What do you think?





Print pagePDF pageEmail page

  Americans Never Give Up Your Guns

 These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.

This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes crisscrossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds (And who were the reds? read this [ Capt_Schuyler_to_Colonel_Barrows-War_Dept_Siberia-1919-3pgs-GOV.sml].

It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington’s clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere….but criminals are still armed and still murdering and to often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.

For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or “talking to them”, it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?

No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

Here is a flyer idea a friend sent to me.       ATTENTION_FLYER